<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PLAY ON OUR IMPATIENCE:</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sovereigntyblog.com/2006/11/09/play-on-our-impatience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sovereigntyblog.com/2006/11/09/play-on-our-impatience/</link>
	<description>Companion blog to the book Redefining Sovereignty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:12:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orrin</title>
		<link>http://sovereigntyblog.com/2006/11/09/play-on-our-impatience/#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Orrin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 04:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sovereigntyblog.com/2006/11/09/play-on-our-impatience/#comment-338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gates is a good bureaucrat, which is all Rummy is.  If there&#039;s a war he can run it.  Meanwhile there&#039;s a military to be modernized.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gates is a good bureaucrat, which is all Rummy is.  If there&#8217;s a war he can run it.  Meanwhile there&#8217;s a military to be modernized.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim hamlen</title>
		<link>http://sovereigntyblog.com/2006/11/09/play-on-our-impatience/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jim hamlen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 02:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sovereigntyblog.com/2006/11/09/play-on-our-impatience/#comment-337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OJ, in your glib way, you are correct.  But I&#039;m afraid the President has lost his mojo.
And his keen edge.  And Robert Gates is not the man to be SecDef if that is what George
Bush is going to do.  He would have done better nominating Bono.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OJ, in your glib way, you are correct.  But I&#8217;m afraid the President has lost his mojo.<br />
And his keen edge.  And Robert Gates is not the man to be SecDef if that is what George<br />
Bush is going to do.  He would have done better nominating Bono.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Orrin</title>
		<link>http://sovereigntyblog.com/2006/11/09/play-on-our-impatience/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Orrin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 02:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sovereigntyblog.com/2006/11/09/play-on-our-impatience/#comment-336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To the contrary, one of the easiest ways for W to control an unruly opposition would be to just start another war.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the contrary, one of the easiest ways for W to control an unruly opposition would be to just start another war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim hamlen</title>
		<link>http://sovereigntyblog.com/2006/11/09/play-on-our-impatience/#comment-335</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jim hamlen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 01:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sovereigntyblog.com/2006/11/09/play-on-our-impatience/#comment-335</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OJ:

You are exactly right.  Because now, no matter the evils of Syria (or the relative ease
with which it could be changed, and the benefits of doing so), it won&#039;t happen.  Given the
situation in D.C., we couldn&#039;t even get consensus on attacking Khartoum to &quot;free&quot; Darfur
(even if Sudan is in &#039;violation&#039; of UN agreements).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OJ:</p>
<p>You are exactly right.  Because now, no matter the evils of Syria (or the relative ease<br />
with which it could be changed, and the benefits of doing so), it won&#8217;t happen.  Given the<br />
situation in D.C., we couldn&#8217;t even get consensus on attacking Khartoum to &#8220;free&#8221; Darfur<br />
(even if Sudan is in &#8216;violation&#8217; of UN agreements).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy P</title>
		<link>http://sovereigntyblog.com/2006/11/09/play-on-our-impatience/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandy P]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sovereigntyblog.com/2006/11/09/play-on-our-impatience/#comment-334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Or actually communicating w/us more.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or actually communicating w/us more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

