Comments on: BUT WHAT IF THEY DON'T DANCE WITH THEM WHAT BRUNG 'EM?:

By: Sandy P

Sandy P — Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:46:18 +0000

After Kelo, the unelected 9 dare once again to go against the citizens?

By: jim hamlen

jim hamlen — Sat, 11 Nov 2006 04:20:48 +0000

AWW -

The Supremes let Arizona keep its law this time, and I doubt if they would overturn a bill from Congress on this subject.

It certainly would have passed with O’Connor on the Court – she was a stickler for that sort of thing.

By: AWW

AWW — Sat, 11 Nov 2006 03:16:44 +0000

Jim – why bother passing voter id requirements when the courts (as in Georgia and Missouri) just strike them down as
unfair?

By: jim hamlen

jim hamlen — Sat, 11 Nov 2006 01:46:04 +0000

If the President is smart, he will wrap a voter ID requirement into any immigration legislation. The Dems may not go
along, but it should pacify the squawking Right. The GOP couldn’t have passed it before, but now….

By: AWW

AWW — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 20:21:54 +0000

There was a quick overview of this election which was: Dems said “Had enough”, GOP said “It could be worse”, voters said “Let’s find out”

As Jim said the Dems, if they act like Clinton did in 93-94, will get pounded in ’08. And has been noted before most of the new Dem office holders are moderates or even slightly conservative, meaning Nancy/Ted/Leahy/Conyers/Rangel shouldn’t be able to do much damage.

As for immigration NRO and others are claiming not being strong enough on immigration hurt the gop. Given the sizable drop in hispanic support for the GOP that doesn’t sound right.

By: Orrin

Orrin — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:56:06 +0000

The math is easy: religious whites, Asians, Latinos & blacks = greater than 50%. Seculars and Darwinists = less than 50%.

By: Orrin

Orrin — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:53:28 +0000

Had Newt kept it shutdown Clinton would have folded.

By: Jim in Chicago

Jim in Chicago — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:48:28 +0000

Dave:

The anti-immigration wing was driving the Republican Party smack into a wall at 120 mph. This election neuters them, and at little cost as long as the Dem majority is narrow and we keep the white house.

By: Raoul Ortega

Raoul Ortega — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:36:50 +0000

In other words, will the Dems be smart enough to avoid their version of the gov’t shutdown fiascos of ’95? Then again, they will be doing battle against the Stupid Party…

By: Dave W

Dave W — Fri, 10 Nov 2006 19:28:16 +0000

This is not “a good thing”, Jim. Hopefully though, we can minimize the damage that the left will attempt to inflict upon society in the name of (their version of) “progress”.